Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Covel et al v. PNC Bank N.A. et al
as 5:2019cv02030
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, PNC Bank N.A., John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Samar Covel and Jason Covel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Covell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02844
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Theresa Covell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Paul Matus v. Lorain County General Health, et al
as 16-4094
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
PAUL MATUS
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
LORAIN COUNTY GENERAL HEALTH DISTRICT
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH G. PEARCE, WILLIAM SPRENG and DAVID P. COVELL
Covell v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv13033
Plaintiff:
Gerald Covell
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Covell et al v. Maury Co. Jail et al
as 1:2013cv00139
Plaintiff:
Joshua M. Covell and Anthony Sanders
Defendant:
Maury Co. Jail and Enoch George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Whitworth et al
as 1:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Marcus Z. Jones and Joshua Covell
Defendant:
Billy Whitworth and Enoch George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Covell v. George et al
as 1:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
Joshua Covell
Defendant:
Enoch George and Maury County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matus v. Lorain County General Health District et al
as 1:2013cv01029
Plaintiff:
Paul Matus
Defendant:
Lorain County General Health District , Kenneth G. Pearce , William Spreng and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Sorpyk, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00502
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Emerald Forest Entertainment Company, Inc., Hori Productions America, Inc. doing business as Dinger and Ollie Music and others
Defendant:
Sorpyk, Inc. doing business as Club Bijou other Bootleggers and Kypros Diacou
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
