Cases 21 - 30 of 340
Panaro et al v. United Airlines, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Jackie Panaro and Matthew Robbin
Defendant:
United Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Panaro et al v. United Airlines, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Jackie Panaro and Matthew Robbin
Defendant:
United Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Panaro et al v. United Airlines, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Jackie Panaro and Matthew Robbin
Defendant:
United Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robbins v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03391
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Robbins
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Robbins v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02615
Plaintiff:
Tanyula Robbins
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Price et al v. Chippewa, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Diane Veen Price, Sherri Rockwell, Daniel Clement and others
Defendant:
Chippewa, County of, Carmen M. Fazzari, Marjorie Hank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Robin Riley, Jr.
as 23-3376
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBIN DEAN RILEY, JR., aka Robbin Riley
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
