Cases 31 - 40 of 584
Love v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03384
Plaintiff:
Brenda Love
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Collins v. Artis et al
as 2:2023cv12570
Plaintiff:
Brandon D. Collins
Defendant:
Fredeane Artis, Mark McDonald, Woods and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
National Basketball Academy, LLC v. Love
as 1:2023cv01820
Plaintiff:
The National Basketball Academy, LLC and National Basketball Academy, LLC
Defendant:
Eric Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Loving v. Douglas
as 2:2023cv12287
Petitioner:
Joseph Loving
Respondent:
MaComb, People of and Adam Douglas
Kleyn et al v. Muskegon, County of et al
as 1:2023cv00928
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kleyn, Don Knox, T.J., Estate of Love and others
Defendant:
Muskegon, County of and Tony Moulatsiotis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights
First Property Holdings, LLC et al v. Menominee, City of et al
as 2:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
First Property Holdings, LLC d/b/a RIZE, The Fire Station, LLC and First Property Holdings, LLC a Michigan limited liability company doing business as RIZE
Defendant:
City of Menominee, O.I. Holdings, LLC, Higher Love Corporation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Wilcox v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2023cv02477
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Wilcox
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Lancaster Correctional Institution, C.O. Whitey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Love et al
as 1:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
Antoine Lee
Defendant:
Renee Love, Cieria Lovett and Owner of Hometown and Studio and Suites by Red Roof
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
