Cases 41 - 50 of 457
Hernandez et al v. Alcala et al (TV1)
as 2:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Jose Hernandez, Juana Gomez and Jose Manuel-Hernandez
Defendant:
Nicholas Alcala, Saul A. Carrera and Alcala Bros Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Gomez v. D & M Bolanos Drywall, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02334
Plaintiff:
Carlos Gomez
Defendant:
D & M Bolanos Drywall, LLC, Mirna Bolanos, David Bolanos and others
Heidy Gomez Andret, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3426
Petitioner:
HEIDY CAROLINA GOMEZ ANDRET and CIRILO GOMEZ ANDRET
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Gomez v. Ryan et al
as 2:2023cv01058
Plaintiff:
John P Gomez and John Paul Gomez
Defendant:
David Ryan, Travis Stevens, Retired Judge Dan W Favreau and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Trenco et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01045
Plaintiff:
Juan Trenco and Sheila Gomez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cristina Gomez-Mendoza, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3243
Petitioner:
CRISTINA GOMEZ-MENDOZA and KEILY JUDITH AGUSTIN-GOMEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Adolfo Gomez-Santos v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3206
Petitioner:
ADOLFO GOMEZ-SANTOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Gomez #714409 v. Lovato
as 2:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Gomez #714409
Defendant:
Alicia Lovato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
McKinley v. Gomez et al
as 2:2023cv02117
Plaintiff:
John Tyler McKinley
Defendant:
Sanchez Yobany Gomez and Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
