Cases 51 - 60 of 1,910
Bolen v. G & M Automotive Transport, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
David M. Bolen
Defendant:
G & M Automotive Transport, INC. and Deshawn Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Devilla v. Westlake Vinyls, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Dominic Devilla
Defendant:
Westlake Vinyls, Inc., Westlake Vinyl Corporation, Westlake Chemical OPCO LP and others
Cross Defendant:
Qualus Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Thomas v. Green
as 0:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Tarell Thomas
Respondent:
James David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomason v. Knight
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Thomason
Defendant:
David Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bryant et al v. Wilder et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Bryant and Ann W.E. Bryant
Defendant:
Kimberly Wilder, David Wilder and Attorney Matthew Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Johnson v. Knight et al
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Kelly Michelle Johnson
Defendant:
Jailer David Knight, Nurse Kristy and Deputy Jailer Jennifer Bounds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Maness et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Clarence Vaughn
Defendant:
Blake Maness, John Michael Hill, David Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holliman v. Stanton et al
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
David Holliman
Defendant:
Steve Stanton, Stanton Homes, LLC. and Zachary Stayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Knight
as 5:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
David Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
