Cases 71 - 80 of 32,997
Evans v. Davis et al.
as 4:2024cv01499
Defendant:
Warden Anthony Davis and John and Jane Does
Plaintiff:
Johnny Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
John A. Marshall
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Whitfield v. Runyan et al.
as 3:2024cv01497
Defendant:
Montgomery County Board of Commissioners, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Caleb Whitfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Spearman #158437 v. Fager
as 1:2024cv00890
Defendant:
John Fager
Plaintiff:
Maurice James Spearman #158437
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flinn v. Portage County, Ohio et al.
as 5:2024cv01492
Defendant:
Bryan Morgenstern, Maddison Knapp, Josh Orwick and others
Plaintiff:
Kieve Flinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Krzywkowski v. Mohr et al
as 2:2024cv03902
Defendant:
Warden Keith Foley, Katrenia Baker-Webb, Dessey Cheers and others
Plaintiff:
Grady Krzywkowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Daughty et al
as 3:2024cv01057
Defendant:
Dustin Tidwell, Metro Police Dept. of Davidson County, Justin Vaughn and others
Plaintiff:
Trevor Manny Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Hudson
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
John Holsen Miller
Defendant:
George Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Golden v. Pelfry et al
as 5:2024cv00233
Defendant:
Jarod Pelfry, Ragen, John Holland and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Golden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00465
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
