Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Moore v. Augustus
as 1:2024cv00923
Defendant:
Davyon Augustus
Plaintiff:
Darryl D. Moore, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Robertson v. Shelby County Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv02290
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LASHEA ROBERTSON and Ronnie Lashea Williams
Defendant:
Shelby County Division of Corrections, Anthony Alexander, Mayor Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Augustus v. Greene County Adult Probation Dept. et al
as 2:2022cv04221
Plaintiff:
Anthony Augustus
Defendant:
Greene County Adult Probation Dept., Greene County Adult Common Pleas Court and Josh Mixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Augustus v. Green County Adult Detention Center
as 2:2022cv03965
Plaintiff:
Anthony Augustus
Defendant:
Green County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Augustus v. Green County Adult Detention Center
as 3:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Anthony Augustus
Defendant:
Green County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IOU Central Inc. d/b/a IOU Financial Inc. v. Tyler Promotions LLC et al
as 2:2022cv10581
Plaintiff:
IOU Central Inc. d/b/a IOU Financial Inc.
Defendant:
Tyler Promotions LLC, Tyler Promotions2 LLC, Prime Eight Ten LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Abel et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 2:2021cv04288
Plaintiff:
Augustus Abel and Sandra Abel
Defendant:
Monsanto Company and Bayer AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Augustus Young
as 21-5699
Petitioner:
In re: AUGUSTUS YOUNG
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Augustus Young
as 21-5331
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: AUGUSTUS YOUNG
Proctor v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00132
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Augustus G. Proctor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
