Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Barnes v. A.W. Chersteron Company et al
as 3:2009cv01104
Plaintiff:
Tammy Barnes
Defendant:
A.W. Chersteron Company, Bayer Cropscience LP, Bondex, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Olwen Moeller v. Garlock Sealing Technologies,
as 09-5670
Plaintiff - Appellee:
OLWEN MOELLER, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Robert L. Moeller
Defendant - Appellant:
GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Fellows v. Reunion
as 1:2009cv10015
Plaintiff:
Ray Fellows and Ray Fellows
Defendant:
Allied Glove Corporation, Anchor Packing Company, A.O. Smith Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Lah v. Alfa Laval, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv10008
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Lah, Jr., Joseph F. Lah, Jr. and Joseph F. Lah, Jr.
Defendant:
Alfa Laval, Inc., Armstrong International, Inc., Cameron International Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hendley et al v. American Standard, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv00208
Plaintiff:
Harold Hendley, Harold Hendley, Harold Hendley and others
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc., Aqua-Chem, Inc, Aqua-Chem, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Arington v. A.W. Chesterton Co. et al
as 3:2007cv00672
Plaintiff:
Linda Arington, Linda Arington and Linda Arington
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Co., American Standard, Inc., BF Goodrich Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Moeller et al v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC et al
as 3:2007cv00065
Plaintiff:
Robert Moeller, Robert Moeller, Owen Moeller and others
Defendant:
Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC, Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC and John Crane, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
