Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00080
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
John Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tipton v. Maverick Protection Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv11210
Counter Defendant:
Joshua Tipton
Counter Claimant:
Maverick Protection Group, Inc. and David Schlecte
Defendant:
John Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Miller v. C. R. Bard et al
as 2:2023cv04111
Plaintiff:
John Miller
Defendant:
C. R. Bard and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Robert Hammer, et al
as 22-0504
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT HAMMER, Assistant Special Agent in Charge, HSI, DAVID VICENTE PENA, FRANCISCO AYALA, Agent, ICE ERO and others
Respondent:
ISABELA ZELAYA, GERONIMO GUERRERO, CAROLINA ROMULO MENDOZA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Miller v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03962
Plaintiff:
John Miller
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pleasant View Baptist Church, et al v. Andy Beshear
as 21-6028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PLEASANT VIEW BAPTIST CHURCH, PLEASANT VIEW BAPTIST SCHOOL, PASTOR DALE MASSENGALE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW G. BESHEAR, individual capacities and ANDY BESHEAR, in his official and individual capacities
Nathaniel Jenkins v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 21-2970
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL JENKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of MDOC, RICHARD RUSSELL, Hearing Administrator, HEARING OFFICER O'BRIEN and others
Jenkins #155668 v. Washington et al
as 2:2021cv00194
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jenkins #155668
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Richard Russell, Unknown O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
