Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
In re: Corey Manning
as 17-1643
Movant: In re: COREY MANNING, named as Corey L. Manning
Respondent: CARMEN DENISE PALMER, Warden, also named "Patricia Caruso", (M.D.O.C. Dir.) as respondent
Manning, Hatchett, & Associates Consulting Group LLC et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv13391
Plaintiff: Manning, Hatchett, & Associates Consulting Group LLC and Antonio L. Manning
Defendant: J.P. Morgan Chase & Company and J.P. Morgan Chase National Corporation
Ellis v. City of Trotwood et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00433
Plaintiff: Anthony Ellis, Jr
Defendant: City of Trotwood, James L. Manning, Richard Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. Manning et al
as 1:2015cv00761
Plaintiff: Anthony Ellis, Jr
Defendant: James L. Manning, Richard Thomas, Eldon Spillman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easterling v. Manning We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00058
Plaintiff: Warren Easterling
Defendant: James L Manning, Judge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Manning et al v. Arch Wood Protection, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2013cv00127
Plaintiff: Fred L. Manning and Linda Manning
Defendant: Arch Wood Protection, Inc., Osmose Inc., Chemical Specialties, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corey Manning v. Carmen Palmer
as 09-1319
Petitioner - Appellant: COREY MANNING, named as Corey L. Manning
Respondent - Appellee: CARMEN PALMER, Warden, also named "Patricia Caruso", (M.D.O.C. Dir.) as respondent
Manning #251889 v. Palmer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01090
Petitioner: Corey L. Manning #251889
Respondent: Carmen Palmer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?