Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Vicente Martinez-Jimenez v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3456
Petitioner:
VICENTE MARTINEZ-JIMENEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Vassallo v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 4:2023cv10980
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vicente Vassallo
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ortiz #569152 v. Corrigan
as 2:2022cv00238
Petitioner:
Vicente Rodriguez Ortiz #569152, II
Respondent:
James Corrigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCoy v. Heavenly Circle LLC, et al
as 1:2022cv01930
Plaintiff:
Stephanie McCoy
Defendant:
Heavenly Circle LLC doing business as Heavenly Circle Home Care, LLC, Marilyn Vicente and Elba Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
In re: Robert Hammer, et al
as 22-0504
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT HAMMER, Assistant Special Agent in Charge, HSI, DAVID VICENTE PENA, FRANCISCO AYALA, Agent, ICE ERO and others
Respondent:
ISABELA ZELAYA, GERONIMO GUERRERO, CAROLINA ROMULO MENDOZA and others
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Shumake, Jr. et al
as 2:2021cv12193
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert Samuel Shumake, Jr., Willard L Jackson, Nicole T Birch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Alvarado Perez v. Black
as 5:2021cv01071
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Petitioner:
Ciriaco Vicente Alvarado Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alejandro Vicente-Sontay v. Robert Wilkinson
as 21-3085
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
ALEJANDRO VICENTE-SONTAY
USA v. Vicente Corona
as 20-6309
Defendant / Appellant:
VICENTE CORONA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Elmer Vicente-Vicente
as 20-1972
Defendant / Appellant:
ELMER RAFAEL VICENTE-VICENTE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
