Cases 21 - 30 of 57
KUEBLER et al v. VECTREN CORPORATION et al
as 3:2018cv00113
Defendant:
PATRICK K. MULLEN, VECTREN CORPORATION, , Jr. JAMES H. DEGRAFFENREIDT and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KUEBLER, MATTHEW VONSALZEN, RICHARD SCARANTINO and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NISENHAL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01187
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00234
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
JONES v. COLLECTO, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv02346
Defendant:
COLLECTO, INC. and US ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JONES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01541
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01208
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
JONES v. ACCURIDE CORPORATION et al
as 3:2016cv00210
Defendant:
ACCURIDE CORPORATION, ROBERT J. ADAMS, KEITH E. BUSSE and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLENE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
HERFF JONES, INC. v. MCCREARY
as 1:2016mc00065
Plaintiff:
HERFF JONES, INC.
Defendant:
MORGAN D. MCCREARY
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
