Cases 61 - 70 of 312
The Estate of Jeffery Nottestad, by its Special Administrator Arianne Clark v. La Crosse County
as 3:2021cv00535
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Jeffery Nottestad, by its Special Administrator Arianne Clark
Defendant:
La Crosse County, Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., Amber Fennigkoh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Koziol
as 1:2021cv03880
Plaintiff:
Kalvin Clark
Defendant:
Chris Koziol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Cook County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2021cv03093
Defendant:
Sheriff Dart, Cook County, Illinois, Officer Wicker and others
Plaintiff:
Josiah Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgs v. Repay et al
as 2:2021cv00164
Defendant:
Kyle W Allen, Sr, Jerry Tippy, Michael Repay and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony W Higgs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
CHEEK v. CLARK
as 1:2021cv01079
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CHEEK
Defendant:
MARCUS CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keeler v. Village of Oak Lawn et al
as 1:2021cv01712
Defendant:
Oak Lawn Police Department, Officers on foot patrol at stop sign at Major Ave., Village of Oak Lawn and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin J. Keeler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SWEENEY v. KRAMER et al
as 2:2021cv00156
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY, INDIANA and HAROLD D. KRAMER
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD SWEENEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERBER v. CLARK et al
as 1:2021cv00660
Defendant:
S RECH, G SLAYBAUGH, E FLOHE and others
Plaintiff:
JEFF HERBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIRCKS et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv00451
Defendant:
RICHARD PAYNE, JEFFREY KELLER, BENNII WELDY and others
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN DIRCKS and BARRY DIRCKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv07824
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Steven Spremo and Donald Clark
Plaintiff:
Curtis Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
