Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Booker v. Tack et al
as 3:2024cv50344
Defendant:
William Bruno, Mirella Susnjar, Jane Marinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie Booker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daheya v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50328
Defendant:
Lt. Stevens, Bruno, Sgt Nailor and others
Plaintiff:
Saber Daheya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Pearson et al
as 3:2024cv50299
Defendant:
Gallegos, Spring, Luiasia and others
Plaintiff:
Sam Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard v. Presley et al
as 3:2024cv50134
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard
Defendant:
Katherine Presley, Amanda Irick, Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weathers v. Mershon et al
as 3:2024cv50130
Plaintiff:
Lamon Weathers, Lil Trave, Paco and others
Defendant:
Kristine Mershon, Ms. A. Scott, Ronald Ostrum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Stevens et al
as 1:2023cv01426
Plaintiff:
David A Pearson, Jr
Defendant:
Kevin A Carr, Christopher Stevens, C ODonnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. DUNN et al
as 1:2023cv01363
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
DUNN, MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Pearson et al
as 3:2023cv50155
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Trevon Robinson
Defendant:
Adrian Pearson, Gregory Burke and Jacob Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MENZIE v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. MENZIE
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, CITY OF NEW CASTLE, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. JONES et al
as 1:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
JAMA JONES, MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
