Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Koehler v. Shumm et al
as 1:2024cv01306
Defendant:
City of Pontiac Illinois and Derek Shumm
Plaintiff:
Travis J Koehler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lubner v. City of Cedarburg et al
as 2:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Mary Lubner
Defendant:
City of Cedarburg, Michael McNerney, Dustin Koehlers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kampa v. City of Cedarburg et al
as 2:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Erik Kampa
Defendant:
City of Cedarburg, Michael McNerney, Dustin Koehlers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 1 U.S.C. § 102 Americans with Disabilities Act
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 1:2020cv01436
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie C Moline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00908
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
NM a minor 7319 2012
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00906
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie C Moline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00907
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
KM a minor 1690 2010
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCurry v. MARS et al
as 1:2019cv04067
Defendant:
MARS, Kenco Logistics Services, LLC, The Reed Group and others
Plaintiff:
Edith McCurry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
