Cases 1 - 10 of 444
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07950
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Durr v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv07808
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Office of the Attorney General and Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Stephen Durr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01376
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2
Nat'l Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws, et al v. Latoya Hughes
as 24-2103
Defendant:
LATOYA HUGHES, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RATIONAL SEXUAL OFFENSE LAWS and JASON RIDLEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05022
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Estate of Tyshun L Lemons v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00703
Defendant:
Kevin A Carr, Jared Hoy, Wisconsin Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Tyshun L Lemons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemons v. Carr et al
as 2:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Iema D Lemons
Defendant:
Kevin A Carr, Jared Hoy, Randall Hepp and others
Other:
Tyshun Lemons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Stephen Durr v. State of Illinois, et al
as 24-1939
Defendant:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DURR
Kareen Hayes v. Department of Corrections
as 24-1828
Plaintiff:
KAREEN HAYES
Defendant:
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
