Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Lewis, Jason v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2023cv00223
Petitioner:
Jason Michael Lewis
Respondent:
R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lazcon, Martin v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2023cv00151
Petitioner:
Martin Lazcon
Respondent:
Warden R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Helfrich, Richard v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2023cv00068
Petitioner:
Richard Helfrich
Respondent:
Warden R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ruiz, Jesus v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2023cv00037
Petitioner:
Jesus Ruiz
Respondent:
R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nelson, Cortez v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2022cv00731
Petitioner:
Cortez David Nelson
Respondent:
R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thompson, Patrick v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2022cv00634
Petitioner:
Patrick D. Thompson
Respondent:
Warden R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Luedtke, James v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2022cv00589
Petitioner:
James Luedtke
Respondent:
R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hettinger, Roger v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2022cv00536
Petitioner:
Roger Hettinger
Respondent:
Warden R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Khamvongsa, Southone v. Keyes, R.D. et al
as 3:2022cv00534
Petitioner:
Southone Billy Khamvongsa
Respondent:
Warden R.D. Keyes, Director of BOP Michael Carvajal and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones, Corey v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2022cv00533
Petitioner:
Corey Anthony Jones
Respondent:
Warden R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.