Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Roberts v. Watters
as 3:2009cv00400
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Roberts
Defendant:
Steve Watters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Watters
as 2:2009cv00452
Petitioner:
Marcellous L Walker
Respondent:
Steve Watters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hedgespeth v. Bartow et al
as 3:2009cv00246
Plaintiff:
Raymond K. Hedgespeth, Jr.
Defendant:
Byron Bartow and Steven Watters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kuruzovich v. Wisconsin State Legislative Council et al
as 3:2009cv00153
Plaintiff:
Brian Kuruzovich
Defendant:
Wisconsin State Legislative Council, Steve Watters, SRSTC Director and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
David v. State of Wisconsin Department of Health Services
as 3:2008cv00536
Plaintiff:
David
Defendant:
State of Wiscinsin Department of Health Services, Karen Timberlake, Kevin R Hayden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Watters
as 3:2008cv00518
Petitioner:
Stanley E Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Steve Watters
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Purifoy v. Watters
as 2:2008cv00722
Petitioner:
Randy Purifoy
Respondent:
Steve Watters
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hedgespeth v. Watters
as 3:2008cv00410
Plaintiff:
Raymond K. Hedgespeth, Jr.
Defendant:
Steve Watters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker et al v. Wisconsin State Legislative Council et al
as 3:2007cv00675
Plaintiff:
Marcellous L Walker, Alvester Gross, Hung Nam Tran and others
Defendant:
Wisconsin State Legislative Council, JAMES E. DOYLE, Kevin R Hayden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kamp v. Health & Family Services et al
as 3:2007cv00593
Petitioner:
Richard L Kamp
Defendant:
Health & Family Services, Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center, Steve Watters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
