Cases 31 - 40 of 199
LaCroix v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Defendant:
DeAngelo Dove, Christopher Erwing, Brandon French and others
Plaintiff:
Terry LaCroix and Terry Lynn LaCroix
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon, Samterious v. Lobenstein, K. et al
as 3:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
Samterious Gordon
Defendant:
K. Lobenstein, Plucinski, Lynn Washetas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lavell Gordon v. USA
as 22-1142
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAVELL A. GORDON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The Estate of Brian Collins et al v. Milwaukee County et al
as 2:2021cv01438
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Brian Collins, Breon Gordon-Collins, Ajanae Gordon-Collins and others
Defendant:
Milwaukee County, Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation, C.O. Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01221
Plaintiff:
Bernard T Gordon
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc and Green Bay Correctional Institution Health Services Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bohlinger v. Neal et al
as 3:2021cv00588
Plaintiff:
Jason R Bohlinger
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Josh Wallen, Bootz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Neal et al
as 3:2021cv00517
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Commissioner, Board of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. USA
as 2:2021cv00183
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Lavell A Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gordon, Samterious v. Winkleski, D. et al
as 3:2021cv00274
Defendant:
D. Winkleski, K Lobenstein, Karma Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Samterious Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon, John v. Mendota Mental Health Institution
as 3:2021cv00225
Defendant:
Mendota Mental Health Institution
Plaintiff:
John T. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
