Cases 1 - 10 of 5,585
Brown v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv08885
Defendant:
County of Cook, Illinois and Thomas Dart
Plaintiff:
William Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv02227
Respondent:
Thomas Lillard
Petitioner:
Earl Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore et al v. Jewell et al
as 2:2024cv01226
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Gonzalez-Colon, Patrick Lewis, Clayton Thomas Moore and others
Defendant:
Lt Owens, Lt Cross, Chantell Jewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOLIDAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01642
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
THOMAS LEE GOLIDAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Praul v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00772
Petitioner:
Harlan Praul, Harlan Thomas Praul and Harlan T Praul
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hilal v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv08567
Plaintiff:
Eman Hilal
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Ikanih et al
as 2:2024cv01176
Plaintiff:
Clayton Thomas Moore
Defendant:
Ikanih and Chantell Jewell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watson v. Markham Courthouse et al
as 1:2024cv08378
Defendant:
Whelan, Thomas Dart, M Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Larry James Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
GONGORA v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01559
Plaintiff:
THOMAS GONGORA
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES LLC and ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wakefield v. Scoble et al
as 3:2024cv02150
Defendant:
Dr. Ibraheim, Sue Mason, Megan Duiguid and others
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Wakefield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
