Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Lee v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01411
Plaintiff:
Kelly A Lee
Defendant:
Matt Smith, Woodford County Illinois, Dennis Wertz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clong v. Henry County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2023cv04056
Plaintiff:
Stephen Clong
Defendant:
Henry County Sheriff's Department, Nancy Lessard, Jerrico Lessard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ty-Juan Keith v. People of the State of Illinois
as 22-3156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TY-JUAN KEITH
Defendant / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
Evans v. Monaco et al
as 3:2022cv00871
Plaintiff:
Ty Evans
Defendant:
Jacqueline Monaco and Wexford of Indiana LLC
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkerson v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00901
Petitioner:
Ty Wilkerson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Teddy Driver v. Ty Solomon, et al
as 22-1866
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TEDDY H. DRIVER
Defendant / Appellee:
TY SOLOMON, Kokomo Police Officer #372, TRAVIS WILLIAMS, Kokomo Police Officer #387, CODY RAYLS, Kokomo Police Officer, a.k.a. OFFICER CODY RAYLES and others
Puckett v. Robinson Correctional Center et al
as 3:2021cv00771
Plaintiff:
Ty Puckett
Defendant:
Robinson Correctional Center and Rexford Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyjuan v. People Of The State Of Illinois et al
as 1:2021cv01857
Defendant:
People Of The State Of Illinois
Plaintiff:
Keith Tyjuan and Ty-Juan Keith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2020cv03248
Defendant:
TOMAW, BRAD, ROWL and others
Plaintiff:
JERALD BROUDE, RICHARD M. REEVES, PATRICK B. COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanson, Ty v. Urbonas, Vincent et al
as 3:2020cv01121
Defendant:
Vincent Urbonas, Michelle Hubbard and Eric Losee
Plaintiff:
Ty A. Hanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
