Cases 11 - 20 of 502
Ambers v. Tippecanoe County et al
as 4:2024cv00051
Defendant:
David S. Byers, Jared W. Davis, Tippecanoe County of and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E Ambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Mean v. Nursing Staff et al
as 3:2024cv01542
Plaintiff:
Darnell Mean
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner Bob and Doctor Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montanez v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01346
Defendant:
Angela Lankford, John/Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Pierre A. Montanez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Crayton v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Keimon Crayton
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Bob, Ally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00896
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Bob Alexander
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
The Department of Transportation of the State of Illinois v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 3:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
The Department of Transportation of the State of Illinois
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Bob Watt and Unknown Owners and Nonrecord Claimants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Munson v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
James Munson
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Steve Meeks, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
