Cases 31 - 40 of 163
Ward v. USA
as 3:2021cv00863
Petitioner:
Jarvis Ward
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Edwards et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway et al
as 1:2021cv05096
Plaintiff:
Joyce Edwards, Jonathan Edwards, Jarvis Edwards and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway, Norfolk Southern Police Department, Mark D. Mathewson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mitchell v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv50273
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Mitchell
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections and State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEELE v. WARDEN
as 1:2021cv01903
Petitioner:
JARVIS NELSON PEELE
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dove et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2021pq00633
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Wilber Dove and Deidre Jarvis
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estate of Zachary Sherman et al v. Hill
as 2:2021cv00661
Plaintiff:
Estate of Zachary Sherman, Lawrence Sherman and Christine Sherman
Defendant:
Jarvis W Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whitaker v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc et al
as 3:2021cv03113
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Whitaker
Defendant:
Zorian Trusewych, Wexford Health Sources, Inc, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FALKNER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv00937
Plaintiff:
JARVIS FALKNER and LATOYA FALKNER
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Washington
as 3:2020cv50300
Defendant:
Jarvis Washington
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
IOV 1341 Jarvis Saginaw, LLC v. Seymour
as 1:2020cv03881
Plaintiff:
IOV 1341 Jarvis Saginaw, LLC
Defendant:
Charles Scott Seymour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
