Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Tobin, Juliana v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00687
Plaintiff:
Juliana Tobin
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Sam's East, Inc., Sam's West, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crabtree Residential Living Inc et al v. City of Kenosha et al
as 2:2010cv00691
Plaintiff:
Crabtree Residential Living Inc and Scott Rocco
Defendant:
City of Kenosha, David F Bogdala, Jesse L Downing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rivera et al v. Moss (Star# 30) et al
as 1:2010cv05025
Plaintiff:
Juan Rivera , Janet Escobedo , Juliana Aldaco and others
Defendant:
Melrose Park Office Moss (Star# 30), Melrose Park Officer Potamianos (Star# 86), Melrose Park Officer DiMaio (Star# 7) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. Schmidt et al
as 1:2010cv01819
Plaintiff:
Sherron Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
David F. Schmidt, James D. Hock, Juliana Maller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glibota v. Atlantic Credit & Finance Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00037
Plaintiff:
Anthony Glibota
Defendant:
Atlantic Credit & Finance Inc and Juliana Robertson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Madanella Dwi Mustika et al v. Honeywell International
as 1:2008cv02178
Plaintiff:
Ella Madanella Dwi Mustika, Nia Astrina, Efni Syahril and others
Defendant:
Honeywell, International
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BRETZ v. LHR, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv00453
Plaintiff:
JANET D. BRETZ, JANET D. BRETZ and JANET D. BRETZ
Defendant:
LHR, INC. and JULIANA G. ROBERTSON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
STEINBERG et al v. ROBERTSON
as 1:2007cv00140
Plaintiff:
LAURA STEINBERG and RITA STEINBERG
Defendant:
JULIANA G. ROBERTSON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
