Cases 41 - 50 of 128
WILSON VS LAPPIN ET AL
as 2:2011cv00149
Defendant:
HARRY LAPPIN, WARDEN, WARDEN and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE DOUGLAS WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wolfe v. Lappin et al
as 3:2011cv00450
Plaintiff:
Danny Gene Wolfe
Defendant:
Harvey G Lappin, Michael K. Nalley, Bruce Bledsoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLANCHARD v. THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2011cv00106
Defendant:
MS. BIEGLEY, MR. E. EMMERICH, MR. HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Plaintiff:
RAY BLANCHARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfe v. Lappin et al
as 3:2011cv00215
Plaintiff:
Danny Gene Wolfe
Defendant:
Harvey G Lappin, USA, G. Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MURRAY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2011cv00030
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN and UNITED STATES INSPECTOR GENERAL
Petitioner:
JAMES MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Borrero v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Despaigne Borrero
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, F Castillo, P. Trovillion and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vazquez v. Lappin et al
as 1:2011cv00012
Plaintiff:
Carlos Humberto Gallo Vazquez
Defendant:
Harley Lappin , Martin C Ashman , Ruben Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roger Yeadon, Jr. v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 10-3744
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER YEADON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, RICK V. VEACH, JOSEPH L. NORWOOD and others
Shelton McPike v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 10-3520
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHELTON MCPIKE
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, BRIAN R. JETT, Warden and others
Wilson v. Lappin et al
as 3:2010cv00803
Plaintiff:
Wayne Douglas Wilson
Defendant:
Harry Lappin and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
