Cases 61 - 70 of 176
Turner v. Dawson et al
as 1:2018cv04436
Plaintiff:
Lance Dionte Turner
Defendant:
Brian Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Epperson et al
as 1:2018cv03385
Plaintiff:
Tommy Ray Ortiz
Defendant:
Bill Epperson, Carter, Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nadzhafaliyev v. Dawson
as 1:2018cv02956
Petitioner:
Ali Nadzhafaliyev
Respondent:
Brian Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv00465
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", brenda smith, Frederick Brewer and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc. and Richard Payne
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Owens v. Corcoran et al
as 1:2018cv00334
Plaintiff:
Mark Owens
Defendant:
James P Corcoran, Elgin Mental Health Center (EMHC), Illinois Department of Human Services (IDHS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker v. Dawson et al
as 1:2017cv07980
Plaintiff:
James Baker
Defendant:
Brian Dawson, Bill Epperson, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Dawson et al
as 1:2017cv07484
Plaintiff:
James Baker
Defendant:
Brian Dawson, Bill Epperson, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brent v. Tilden et al
as 1:2017cv01397
Plaintiff:
Michael Brent
Defendant:
Andrew Tilden, Riliwan Ojelade, James R Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2017cv03185
Plaintiff:
Darryl Perry
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Kess Roberson, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nadzhafaliyev et al v. Hardy et al
as 1:2017cv04469
Plaintiff:
Ali Nadzhafaliyev, Sean Gunderson, Paul Olsson and others
Defendant:
Daniel Hardy, Coleen Delaney, Brian Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
