Cases 81 - 90 of 1,485
Fairchild v. Ashley-Hudson Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Marissa Fairchild
Defendant:
Ashley-Hudson Police Department, Town of Ashley, Holden Bellamy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
MARTIN v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SARAH BEDWELL, BOBBI RIGGS, MARY BETH RUTH-SIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. MADDY et al
as 2:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
MADDY, PEACH, ERIC HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH SR., RORIDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH SR. and CHESTERFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, LITTLEJOHN, KEVIN ELMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH SR., RORIDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH SR., RORIDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
TEMPLE v. OREM
as 3:2023cv00209
Petitioner:
ANTHONY J. TEMPLE
Respondent:
JOSHUA G. OREM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
