Cases 1 - 10 of 1,013
Adamczk v. Bowman et al
as 3:2024cv02237
Plaintiff:
Albert Adamczk
Defendant:
Percy Myers, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Pam Sessions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adamczyk v. Wexford Medical Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02337
Defendant:
Pam Sessions, Doctor Shah, Doctor Caldwell and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Adamczyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munoz-Perez v. Myers
as 3:2024cv02137
Plaintiff:
Martin Munoz-Perez
Defendant:
Dr Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Barwick et al
as 3:2024cv02125
Defendant:
Bob Plum, John Barwick, Christine Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Valdez Lamont Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Myers v. LOREAL USA Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv07651
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc, Namaste Laboratories LLC, SoftSheen - Carson, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cooks v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01929
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source Inc and Percy Myers
Plaintiff:
Bobby Cooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 3:2024cv01934
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Nurse James, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booker v. Tack et al
as 3:2024cv50344
Defendant:
William Bruno, Mirella Susnjar, Jane Marinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie Booker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daheya v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50328
Defendant:
Lt. Stevens, Bruno, Sgt Nailor and others
Plaintiff:
Saber Daheya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01763
Defendant:
Dr Myers, Latoya Hughes, Wexford and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
