Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Norcave Properties, LLC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023mc00023
Plaintiff:
Norcave Properties, LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Norcave Properties, LLC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Norcave Properties, LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Mons v. United States of America
as 8:2023cv00243
Petitioner:
Pascal A. Mons
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Barlan Holdings, LLC v. United States of America
as 4:2022mc00330
Plaintiff:
Barlan Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
United States of America
Zins v. United States of America
as 0:2021cv02420
Petitioner:
David Zins
Respondent:
United States and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Vickrey, et al v. United States of America
as 8:2018cv00460
Petitioner:
KIM L. VICKREY and DONN J. VICKREY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Williams Development & Construction, Inc. et al v. United States of America
as 4:2018cv04033
Plaintiff:
Williams Development & Construction, Inc. , Craig Williams , Lee Williams and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
TPP Capital Advisors Ltd. v. United States of America
as 0:2017cv05099
Plaintiff:
TPP Capital Advisors Ltd.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Chan et al v. United States of America Internal Revenue Service
as 4:2014cv01011
Plaintiff:
Bertram Chan and Marie Chan
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
RMRG Enterprises LLC v. The United States of America
as 4:2014cv00902
Plaintiff:
RMRG Enterprises LLC
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
