Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Coy v. Morton et al
as 4:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Adam Eugene Coy
Defendant:
Jessica Morton, Nathaniel Chapman, Krystal Beyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Uriyah Reed v. Rameshlal Rawlani, et al
as 23-3126
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Uriyah Reed
Defendant / Appellee:
Rameshlal Rawlani, Krystal Starks, Jo Newharth and others
McSean v. Hacker et al
as 4:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
Kelly McSean
Defendant:
Denise Hacker, George Killian, William Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Rawlani et al
as 4:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
Uriyah Ben Reed and Uriyah Reed
Defendant:
Rameshlal Rawlani, Krystal Starks, Jo Newharth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tresler v. McBee
as 4:2022cv00354
Petitioner:
Krystal Tresler
Respondent:
Chris McBee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Reed
as 4:2021cv00134
Plaintiff:
Angela Schuncey Richardson
Defendant:
Krystal Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinney v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv00229
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Does Other Agencies of United States of America; Doctor Krystal, Amanda Granger and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Pinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feist v. USA
as 3:2018cv00188
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Krystal Lynn Feist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Spann v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 2:2017cv04074
Plaintiff:
James Lee Spann
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, Jay Cassady, Krystal Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kingston DA GOD f/k/a JC Bryant v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 2:2016cv04314
Plaintiff:
Universal-Unison A Kingston DA GOD f/k/a JC Bryant
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, Krystal Houston, Pamala Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
