Cases 1 - 10 of 437
Auton v. Straughn et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Defendant:
Justin Parker, Thomas W Hurst, William F Straughn and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Auton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Parker v. United States
as 24-2456
Petitioner:
Richard Leroy Parker
Respondent:
United States of America
Yancey v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00514
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, D Earl, James Dycus and others
Plaintiff:
John B Yancey, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Otte v. Arron Wilson, et al
as 24-1992
Plaintiff:
Shawn Otte
Defendant:
Arron Wilson, Chandra Bankhead, Michael Fusselman and others
Roybal et al v. Schnell
as 0:2024cv01652
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Lee Roybal, Native American Practitioners of their Religious Beliefs confined at M.C.F. Stillwater, the, Lance Lee Houle and others
Defendant:
Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Polk County Jail et al
as 4:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Parker, Jr.
Defendant:
Polk County Jail and Teresa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamar v. Dycus et al
as 6:2024cv06033
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Lamar
Defendant:
Donna Dycus, Jared Byers, Herbert Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamar v. Dycus et al
as 4:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Lamar
Defendant:
Donna Dycus, Jared Byers, Herbert Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moser v. Saline County Sheriff's Department
as 4:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Moser
Defendant:
Saline County Sheriff's Department, Parker, Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Gibson et al
as 4:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Sammie H Parker
Defendant:
James Gibson, Anthony Jackson, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
