Cases 11 - 20 of 92
Burgess v. State of Missouri et al
as 5:2024cv06018
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Burgess
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Prosecuting Attorneys Office, Buchanan County, Missouri, City of St Joseph, Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. McCormick
as 6:2023cv06129
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Bryant and Wolf
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike McCormick, Deputy King, Food Administrator Jessie Hundhausen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Catton et al
as 4:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Christian Sean Hicks
Defendant:
Michael Lee Catton, Nicholas Raymond Mark, Nicholas J. Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Catton et al
as 1:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Christian Sean Hicks
Defendant:
Officer Michael Lee Catton, Officer Nicholas Raymond Mark, Officer Nicholas J Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess v. St. Joseph Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv06113
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Burgess
Defendant:
St. Joseph Police Department, Harrison, Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polly v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv01112
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Polly
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Erickson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00865
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Erickson
Defendant:
3M Company, 3M Occupational Safety, LLC, Aearo Holding, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Michael Gordon v. Chris Tripp
as 22-1684
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Lee Gordon
Respondent / Appellee:
Chris Tripp, Warden
Anderson v. Payne
as 4:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Anderson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon v. Tripp
as 4:2022cv00036
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Gordon
Respondent:
Chris Tripp
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
