Cases 31 - 40 of 2,017
McKee et al v. Heard et al
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Barbara McKee and William McKee
Defendant:
Marquet D Heard, Direct Chassislink Inc and Lionhart Transportation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Wood et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01262
Plaintiff:
Barbara Wood and Paul Wood
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Woodward et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Barbara Woodward and John Woodward
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Malone v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
Barbara Malone
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Butler v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01165
Plaintiff:
Barbara L. Butler
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Shattuck-Knaebel v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00454
Defendant:
Unknown Nichols, Missouri Department of Corrections, Bed Broker at Fulton Reception Diagnostic Center (2015) and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Shattuck-Knaebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Parson et al
as 4:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Barbara Johnson, Nicole Price, Narene Crosby and others
Defendant:
Michael L. Parson, Andrew Bailey, Jay Ashcroft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cordero v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
Barbara Cordero
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Biggs et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Luckie Biggs and Barbara Holder
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Berens & Miller, PA et al v. Apex Funding Source LLC et al
as 0:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Berens & Miller, PA and Barbara Berens
Defendant:
Apex Funding Source LLC, Rob Eisenberg and Jane and John Doe Investors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
