Cases 31 - 40 of 1,035
Anthony v. Swope Health Services et al
as 4:2023cv00936
Plaintiff:
Aireania Anthony
Defendant:
Swope Health Services and D.D.S. Marquita Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0233 Remand of tort action involving federally funded business
Herrington v. Thomas et al
as 6:2023cv06134
Plaintiff:
Robert Lane Herrington
Defendant:
Sheriff Neal Thomas, Jail Admin #1 Russ Carmack, Jail Admin #2 Brett Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yates v. Skinner et al
as 4:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
Duane Yates
Defendant:
Beth Skinner, William Sperfslage, Shawn Howard and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Otis Mays, Jr. v. United States
as 23-3273
Petitioner / Appellant:
Otis Ray Mays, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Kelly v. Skinner et al
as 4:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Dakota Kelly
Defendant:
Beth Skinner, William Sperfslage, Shawn Howard and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Hines et al
as 4:2023cv04094
Plaintiff:
Shawn Allen May
Defendant:
Sergeant Hines, Sergeant Eleely and Sergeant Yeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Otis Mays, Jr. v. United States
as 23-3215
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Petitioner / Appellant:
Otis Ray Mays, Jr.
Mays v. Lincoln Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv03188
Plaintiff:
Robert Mays, III
Defendant:
Lincoln Police Department, Warner Asylum and Universal Music Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
