Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Noethe et al
as 4:2024cv04109
Defendant:
Vinson LLC, Lincoln County Treasurer, Urban H. Noethe and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02314
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jones v. Mississippi County, Missouri et al
as 1:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Almashia L Jones
Defendant:
Mississippi County, Missouri, Sheriff Britton Ferrell, Michael Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abelon et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02589
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Hawkins, Jeffrey Herrington, Renita Jackson and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Vinson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02485
Plaintiff:
Terry Vinson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Holman et al v. Potts
as 6:2023cv06057
Cross Defendant:
Paula Holman
Plaintiff:
David Vinson
Cross Claimant:
Raquel Potts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Darrell Woods v. Wesley Fluharty, et al
as 23-1340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell Woods
Defendant / Appellee:
Wesley Fluharty, John and Jane Doe 1, John and Jane Doe 2 and others
Woods v. Fluharty et al
as 1:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Wesley Fluharty, Jane/John Doe 1, Jane/John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burkhart v. Vinson et al
as 2:2022cv04161
Plaintiff:
Dustin Burkhart
Defendant:
Brian Vinson, Camden County, Missouri, Tony Helms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
