Cases 1 - 10 of 1,029
Carl et al v. Shandong Nasen Electric Co., Ltd
as 5:2024mc00075
Defendant:
Shandong Nasen Electric Co., Ltd doing business as Gardguard
Plaintiff:
Jordan Carl and Rachel Carl
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Perdomo v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2024cv00334
Defendant:
Jordan Brackley, Michael Mayanes, Daniel Ray Rockhold and others
Plaintiff:
Aristides Esau Perdomo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aunhkhotep v. Jordan et al
as 4:2024cv01278
Defendant:
John D. Jordan, Justin Barlow, United States Marshal Office and others
Plaintiff:
Aunhk Ra Aunhkhotep
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan v. Aunspagn et al
as 6:2024cv06128
Defendant:
Dr. L. Seamster, Jerry Bradshaw, Virginia Strickland and others
Plaintiff:
Silford Jordan, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00609
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00714
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Schmaltz v. Harris et al
as 4:2024cv01114
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Schmaltz
Defendant:
Tonya Q. Ross, Bernard E. Jordan and James Clifton Harris, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wallace v. Nelson et al
as 4:2024cv00685
Defendant:
S Nelson, D Craig, S Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamont Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newman v. Kinder et al
as 0:2024cv03145
Defendant:
Jordan Anthony Franzwa, Skylar Michael Meiners and Tristan Joseph Kinder
Plaintiff:
Taylor Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
St-Louis et al v. Evolve Bank & Trust
as 4:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Jose Moran, David Henderson, Jordan Bell and others
Defendant:
Evolve Bank & Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
