Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Human v. Dream Style Remodeling of Idaho, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Daniel Human
Defendant:
Dream Style Remodeling of Idaho, Inc. and John and Jane Does 1 through 4
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. 2020 Lexus RX350, VIN: 2T2HZMDA4LC241116 et al
as 6:2023cv03031
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2020 Lexus RX350, VIN: 2T2HZMDA4LC241116, 2020 Ford Transit Van, VIN: NM0LS7E21L1464162, 2020 Jeep Wrangler, VIN: 1C4HJXFGXLW312762 and others
Claimant:
M&T Bank
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Sauerbrei v. Regis Corporation, et al
as 6:2021cv03045
Defendant:
Regis Corporation doing business as Smart Style Hair Salons
Plaintiff:
Linsey Sauerbrei
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. Dakota Style Foods, Inc.
as 5:2020cv05053
Defendant:
Dakota Style Foods, Inc. and Dakota Style, Inc
Plaintiff:
Jodi Anderson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smith v. Styles
as 4:2020cv00387
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Mark A Styles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Styles v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2019cv03238
Plaintiff:
Sol Styles
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Signature Style, Inc. v. Roseland
as 4:2019cv03089
Defendant:
Scott Roseland
Plaintiff:
Signature Style, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Signorello et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02214
Plaintiff:
Aearo Intermediate, LLC, Chadwick Sparks, Chill Tanner and others
Defendant:
Aearo Holdings, LLC, 3M Company, 3M Occupational Safety, LLC and others
Smith v. Styles et al
as 2:2018cv04165
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Mark A Styles, Andy Atkinson and Mark Stringer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
