Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds & Insurance Agency, Inc., et al v. USDHS, et al
as 22-16552
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GONZALES & GONZALES BONDS & INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., TOPPER BROKERAGE, INC., LEXINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHAD F. WOLF, Under the title of Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Vinay Yerrapareddypeddireddy, et al v. Matthew Albence, et al
as 21-17070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINAY YERRAPAREDDYPEDDIREDDY and ANUSHA RATIKRINDI
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security and KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, in his official capacity as Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Veenaben Patel, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 21-17024
Petitioner / Appellant:
VEENABEN DHIRUBHAI PATEL and AJAY RAMABHAI PATEL
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Former U.S. Attorney General, CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, THOMAS HOMAN, Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Angelica Clark, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 21-35560
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELICA CLARK, ELLEN GASS, NATHANIEL WEST and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EVANS and GARRISON DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security and KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Deputy Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security
Defendant:
JOHN DOE SUPERVISORY AND PATROL-LEVEL DEFENDANTS, 1-140; agents of the U.S. Marshals Service, Federal Protective Service, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, acting in concert and in their individual capacitie, GABRIEL RUSSELL, ALLEN JONES and others
Xinyi Jiang v. USCIS, et al
as 21-35198
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary Department of Homeland Security, LAURA B. ZUCHOWSKI, Director USCIS Vermont Service Center, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
XINYI JIANG
Andres Cristobal v. Nathalie Asher, et al
as 21-35169
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Acting Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDRES CRISTOBAL
Pangea Legal Services, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 20-17490
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Deputy Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, JAMES MCHENRY, Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., DOLORES STREET COMMUNITY SERVICES, CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Tianshu Cheng v. USCIS, et al
as 20-17493
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH THOMAS CUCCINELLI, Acting Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, in his Official Capacity and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIANSHU CHENG
Narges Milani v. Kenneth Cuccinelli
as 20-56273
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Acting Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NARGES MILANI
ILRC, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-17339
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ONEAMERICA, CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
