Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,040
Michael Kelly v. CIR
as 23-70058
Petitioner: MICHAEL R. KELLY
Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Andre Price v. Kelly Santoro
as 23-55324
Petitioner / Appellant: ANDRE LASHAUN PRICE
Respondent / Appellee: KELLY SANTORO, Acting Warden
Kelly Cahill, et al v. Nike, Inc.
as 23-80027
Petitioner: KELLY CAHILL, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, SARA JOHNSTON, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, LINDSAY ELIZABETH, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated and others
Respondent: NIKE, INC., an Oregon Corporation
Arturo Gonzalez v. Kelly Santoro
as 23-55269
Petitioner / Appellant: ARTURO GONZALEZ
Respondent / Appellee: KELLY SANTORO, Acting Warden
Alvin Hegge v. Jay Inslee, et al
as 23-35112
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALVIN L HEGGE
Defendant / Appellee: JAY INSLEE, ROBERT FERGUSON, TODD COLEMAN and others
Lamont Karriem v. Cellco Partnership, et al
as 23-15164
Plaintiff / Appellant: LAMONT GARNER KARRIEM
Defendant / Appellee: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, DBA Verizon Wireless, KELLY MAHILL, BRETT ZIMMERMAN, Assistant Sheriff in his personal capacity and others
Kelli Salazar, et al v. USDC-AZPIn re: Kelli Salazar, et al v. USDC-AZP
as 23-70046
Not Classified By Court: In re: KELLI SALAZAR, WAYNE CARPENTER, RODNEY LOPEZ and others
Petitioner: KELLI SALAZAR and GREGORY HANNA, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated individuals
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Sundberg v. Oreol
as 22-2048
Petitioner: KELLY FRITHIOF SUNDBERG
Respondent: HAROLD OREOL, WARDEN
Joseph Johnson v. Brandon Kelly
as 23-35164
Petitioner / Appellant: JOSEPH JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee: BRANDON KELLY
Michael Kelly v. CIR
as 23-70040
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL R. KELLY
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?