Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 254
United States of America v. Monroy-Ramirez
as 24-4825
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CLAUDIA CAROLINA MONROY-RAMIREZ
Carranza, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4479
Petitioner: SEBASTIAN CARRANZA HERNANDEZ, CLAUDIA P HERRERA DIAZ, ALEJANDRO CARRANZA HERRERA and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Aguilar Lindo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4008
Petitioner: WILMAN OMAR AGUILAR LINDO, I, CLAUDIA VIVIANA CARDENAS CAMELO, I and LAURA SOFIA AGUILAR CARDENAS, I
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chavez-Cax v. Garland
as 24-3511
Petitioner: CLAUDIA YESENIA CHAVEZ-CAX
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Argueta Soto, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2781
Petitioner: JOSE CRISTOBAL ARGUETA SOTO, CLAUDIA LIZZETH CHIRINOS MUNGUIA, DYLAN JALETH ARGUETA CHIRINOS and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff: GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant: RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
Camargo Rincon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1376
Petitioner: CAMILO ANDRE CAMARGO RINCON, CLAUDIA MARCELA SANCHEZ-GUZMAN and ANDRES SANTIAGO CAMARGO-SANCHEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez-Ortiz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-727
Petitioner: CARLOS MANO MARTINEZ-ORTIZ, CLAUDIA CAROLINA CHACHAGUA-MAYE and JAQUELINE MARTINEZ-CHACHAGUA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alvarado v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., et al.
as 23-3927
Plaintiff / Appellee: CLAUDIA ALVARADO, individually, and on behalf of others similiarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware corporation and SAM'S WEST INC., an Arkansas corporation
Ramos Palacios v. Garland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-615
Petitioner: CLAUDIA BEATRIZ RAMOS PALACIOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?