Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Gary Warren v. USPC, et al
as 22-16709
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY RONALD WARREN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and UNITED STATES PROBATION AND PAROLE
Matthew Faison v. USPC, et al
as 20-56232
Defendant / Appellee:
MONICA HENDRY, State of Florida Attorney General, official capacity, STATE OF FLORIDA PROBATION AND PAROLE COMMISSION and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW L. FAISON
Frederic Crafts, III v. USPC
as 19-71483
Petitioner:
FREDERIC ALBERT CRAFTS III
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Mutulu Shakur v. David Shinn, et al
as 19-55503
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MUTULU SHAKUR
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, United States Department of Justice, DAVID SHINN, Warden and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Brent Jackson v. USPC
as 19-70898
Petitioner:
BRENT JOSEPH JACKSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Peter Young v. USPC
as 19-70899
Petitioner:
PETER RANDALL YOUNG
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Phillip Martinez v. Steve Langford, et al
as 17-56818
Petitioner - Appellant:
PHILLIP MARTINEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE LANGFORD and CHAIRMAN UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Phillip Martinez v. Steve Langford, et al
as 17-55232
Petitioner - Appellant:
PHILLIP MARTINEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE LANGFORD and CHAIRMAN UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Michael Jackson v. USDC-WAWSE
as 14-71545
:
In re: MICHAEL E. JACKSON
Petitioner:
MICHAEL E. JACKSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and JACK FOX, Warden
Darrell Parks v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr., et al
as 12-57181
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Respondent - Appellee:
ISAAC FULWOOD, Jr., Chairman, United States Parole Commission, PAUL R.A. HOWARD, Examiner, United States Parole Commission, FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Victorville-Federal Correctional Complex and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
