Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Alfred Jackson v. Opus Fund Services USA LLC
as 2:2020cv05774
Defendant:
Opus Fund Services (USA) LLC, Deloitte and Touche LLP, Deloitte Tax, LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Maxx Venture Fund H, LLC, Michael Jackson, Alfred Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AXIS Insurance Company v. Opus Bank et al
as 8:2019cv00420
Defendant:
Stephen H. Gordon and Opus Bank
Plaintiff:
AXIS Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AXIS Insurance Company v. Opus Bank et al
as 2:2019cv01534
Plaintiff:
AXIS Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation and AXIS Insurance Company
Defendant:
Stephen H. Gordon and Opus Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Opus Bank v. Donika Schnell et al
as 8:2017cv00633
Defendant:
Donika Schnell, Gregory Ratliff, Michael Kinnick and others
Plaintiff:
Opus Bank
Undetermined:
Alan Friedman
Interested Party:
MB FINANCIAL, INC. and James Allen, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Roes
Melvyn Klein v. Stephen H. Gordon et al
as 2:2017cv00568
Defendant:
Thomas M. Bowers, Mark Cicirelli, Curtis A. Glovier and others
Plaintiff:
Melvyn Klein
Melvyn Klein v. Stephen H. Gordon et al
as 8:2017cv00123
Defendant:
Thomas M. Bowers, Mark Cicirelli, Curtis A. Glovier and others
Plaintiff:
Melvyn Klein
Winson Tang v. Lindsay Rosenwald et al
as 2:2016cv01317
Defendant:
City of Hope, Does, Fortress Biotech, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Winson Tang
Hanover Insurance Company v. Realty Bancorp Equities LLC
as 5:2016cv00200
Plaintiff:
Hanover Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Opus Investment Management Inc. and The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Realty Bancorp Equities LLC
Opus Bank v. Axis Insurance Company
as 8:2015cv01058
Defendant:
Axis Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Opus Bank
Opus Bank v. Catlin Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2014cv01967
Plaintiff:
Opus Bank
Defendant:
Catlin Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
