Intellectual Property Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 603
Ebony Batts, et al v. William Adams, Jr., et al
as 11-57230
Plaintiff - Appellee: EBONY LATRICE BATTS, an individual, AKA Phoenix Phenom and MANFRED MOHR, an individual
Defendant: WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, ALLAN PINEDA, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Defendant - Appellant: STACY FERGUSON, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, EMI APRIL MUSIC, INC. and HEADPHONE JUNKIE PUBLISHING, LLC
Mattel Inc v. UMG Recordings Inc
as 2:2011cv09813
Plaintiff: Mattel Inc
Defendant: UMG Recordings Inc
Jerry Simpson, Jr. v. Interscope Geffen A&M Record
as 11-17732
Plaintiff - Appellant: JERRY SIMPSON, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: INTERSCOPE GEFFEN A&M RECORDS, a division of UMG Recordings, Inc.
Ebony Batts, et al v. William Adams, Jr., et al Featured Case
as 11-56921
Plaintiff - Appellant: EBONY LATRICE BATTS, an individual, AKA Phoenix Phenom and MANFRED MOHR, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, ALLAN PINEDA, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
UMG Recordings, Inc. v. BCD Music Group, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-56448
Plaintiff - Appellee: UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellant: BCD MUSIC GROUP, INC., a Texas corporation and DEEP DISTRIBUTION WORLDWIDE, INC.
Jacquelyne Hollander v. The Irrevocable Trust Establis, et al
as 11-56296
Plaintiff - Appellant: JACQUELYNE HOLLANDER
Defendant - Appellee: THE IRREVOCABLE TRUST ESTABLISHED BY JAMES BROWN IN AUGUST 1, 2000, RUSSELL L. BAUKNIGHT, Individually and as Trustee of the Irrevocable Trust established By James Brown in August 1, 2000, UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., a Corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware whose principal place of business and registered agent is in California and others
Defendant: UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware whose registered agent and principle place of business is in California and WARNER MUSIC GROUP, INC., a Corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware who operates in California directly and through subsidiaries and who maintains a registered agent in California
Bridgeport Music Inc v. Cash Money Records Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv04952
Plaintiff: Bridgeport Music Inc
Defendant: Michael Carter, Jr, Cash Money Records Inc, UMG Recordings Inc and others
George Clinton v. Will Adams et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv09476
Defendant: Will Adams, Cherry Land Music Publishing Company, Inc., John Curtis and others
Plaintiff: George Clinton
Creditor: Hendricks & Lewis PLLC
Ricky Ross v. William Roberts, II, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-56874
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICKY D. ROSS, an individual, AKA Freeway Rick Ross, AKA Rick D. Ross
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM LEONARD ROBERTS, II, an individual, DBA Rick Ross, DBA Rick Rozay, SHAWN CARTER, an individual, AKA Jay-Z,, individually, and as the former President of Def Jam Music, UMG RECORDINGS, INC., AKA Universal Music Group, A Delaware corporation and subsidiary of Vivendi Universal and others
Bryan Pringle v. William Adams Jr et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2010cv01656
Defendant: Cherry River Music Co, EMI April Music Inc, Stacy Ferguson and others
Plaintiff: Bryan Pringle

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?