Cases 21 - 30 of 85
Tenley Hardin v. Quick Capital Funding, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv10687
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them and Quick Capital Funding, LLC
Plaintiff:
Tenley Hardin
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Joseph Menichiello v. Hardwick Investors Group, LLC
as 8:2018cv01550
Defendant:
Hardwick Investors Group, LLC d/b/a Quick Fi Capital, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,, Does 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Menichiello
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Noffsinger v. Quick Collect, Inc.
as 6:2018cv01447
Defendant:
Quick Collect, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Noffsinger
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Misael Romero v. Eung Keun Lim et al
as 5:2018cv01292
Defendant:
Does, Eliza Jin Lim, Eung Keun Lim and others
Plaintiff:
Misael Romero
Abante Rooter and Plumbing Inc. v. Quick Capital Funding LLC et al
as 4:2018cv03126
Plaintiff:
Abante Rooter and Plumbing Inc.
Defendant:
Quick Capital Funding LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Quick Bridge Funding, LLC v. Double Rafter H Construction Company, L.L.C.et al
as 8:2018cv00776
Defendant:
Double Rafter H Construction Company, L.L.C. and Traeger Hamilton
Plaintiff:
Quick Bridge Funding, LLC
Consuelo Campos v. Quick Travel Staffing, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv03406
Plaintiff:
Consuelo Campos
Defendant:
Does, Belinda Pagliaro, Quick Travel Staffing, Inc. and others
Timothy Quick v. The County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2018cv00105
Defendant:
Does, Robert Guillen, Dave Phelps and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Quick
Timothy Quick v. The County of San Bernardino et al
as 2:2018cv00379
Defendant:
Does, Robert Guillen, Dave Phelps and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Quick
McKinley v. Quick Collect, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01720
Plaintiff:
David McKinley
Defendant:
Quick Collect, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
