Cases 21 - 30 of 1,805
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04936
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00994
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cla Removal - Consumer Leasing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00969
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lokker v. Walmart Inc., et al.
as 24-3445
Plaintiff:
RYAN LOKKER, an individual
Defendant:
WALMART INC. and DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive
Kexin Gao v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2024cv04335
Defendant:
Matthew D. Emrich, Ur M Jaddou, Ted H. Kim and others
Plaintiff:
Kexin Gao
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04319
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00881
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ardon v. Garland, et al.
as 24-3205
Plaintiff:
NAIN M. ARDON
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, In his official capacity and DOES, 1 through 10
Carolyn Navarro v. EXP Realty of California, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03880
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Navarro
Defendant:
EXP Realty of California, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Nuno et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Nuno and Andrea G. Rubio Jimenez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bw Diversity -Breach of Warranty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
