Cases 1 - 10 of 3,330
Weber v. Nextracker Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv09467
Defendant:
David Bennett, Charles Boynton, Daniel Shugar and others
Plaintiff:
Mariel Weber
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
United States of America v. Smith
as 24-7723
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHARLES SMITH
United States of America v. Heard
as 24-7665
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Cheese and CHARLES HEARD
Scarlett v. County of Santa Clara, et al.
as 24-7570
Defendant:
SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, a department of the County of Santa Clara, MOLLY O'NEAL, JEFFREY FRANCIS ROSEN and others
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY THEODORE SCARLETT
Harris v. Sisolak, et al.
as 24-7594
Defendant:
STEVEN SISOLAK, WILLIAM GITTERE, BARBARA CEGAVSKE and others
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.
as 24-7551
Plaintiff:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant:
CHARLES ALVAREZ, Special Investigative Agent, CRAIG APKER, Warden, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as John Doe #1, Special Investigative Agent, named as Jane Doe #2, Captain, and others
Landwer v. Corebridge Direct Insurance Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv03471
Defendant:
Unknown Party, American General Life Insurance Company, Corebridge Direct Insurance Services Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Charles H Landwer
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Reed v. Chambers, et al.
as 24-7406
Defendant:
TERRY REYNOLDS, Director of Business & Industry Office of the Labor Commissioner; #12, DWAUNE WILSON, #12, BRIAN WILLIAMS, #12 and others
Plaintiff:
MAX REED, II, #12
Austin v. ABC Legal Services, LLC, et al.
as 24-7383
Defendant:
CHARLES R. BREYER, DISTRICT JUDGE, EDWARD M. CHEN, DISTRICT JUDGE, MAXINE M. CHESNEY, DISTRICT JUDGE and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN
St. Charles v. O'Malley
as 24-7392
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH L. ST. CHARLES
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
