Cases 1 - 10 of 417
Pham v. King County et al
as 2:2024cv01456
Defendant:
Warren McPherson, King County, Cameron Olson and others
Plaintiff:
Minh Pham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Baca v. King County District Court et al
as 2:2024cv01411
Defendant:
Brian Todd, Robert Van Cleave, Highway State Patrol and others
Plaintiff:
Ereic W Baca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Card v. Hillman et al
as 3:2024cv05764
Defendant:
King County Sheriff SWAT Team, Luke Hillman and Does 1-11
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Herrmann v. Craft et al
as 2:2024cv01054
Defendant:
Leeandra Craft and King County
Plaintiff:
Adrian Clark Herrmann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zayas et al v. McCoy et al
as 2:2024cv01407
Defendant:
Adrienne McCoy, Raychel Puga-Reynoso, Julie DeCamp and others
Plaintiff:
Myriam Zayas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01115
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Moshrif v. King County Prosecution Office et al
as 2:2024cv01306
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Moshrif
Defendant:
King County Prosecution Office and Redmond City Prosecution Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rowland v. King County et al
as 2:2024cv01240
Plaintiff:
Estate of Michael Rowland, karen Rowland and Dow Constantine
Defendant:
King County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01221
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Zayas v. King County et al
as 2:2024cv01194
Defendant:
King County and Adrienne McCoy
Plaintiff:
Myriam Zayas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
