Cases 11 - 20 of 169
Maria Sicinska v. George Bush, et al
as 22-55601
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIA SICINSKA
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE W. BUSH, GEORGE W. HANDY, GOOGLE and others
Joseph v. Phillips et al
as 3:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
Dustin Michael Joseph
Defendant:
Phillips and Bush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Dionne J'Shon Bush
Defendant:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Borla et al
as 5:2022cv00734
Plaintiff:
Joel B Bush
Defendant:
Associate Warden E. Borla, Facility Captain M. Wade, CCII V. Lizaola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
William Rouser v. Theo White, et al
as 22-55139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM ROUSER
Defendant / Appellee:
THEO WHITE, JAMES GOMEZ, Director of Corrections, J. YATES and others
Defendant:
E. W. MEADS, Protestant Chaplain, JACK R. REAGAN, Chief Inmate Appeal and JAMES E. TILTON
Maria Sicinska v. George W. Bush et al
as 2:2022cv01060
Plaintiff:
Maria Sicinska
Defendant:
George W. Bush, George W. Handy, Google and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swint v. Oregon State Mental Hospital et al
as 1:2021cv00531
Defendant:
Spacex, State of Oregon, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Modee #145289 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00454
Defendant:
Travis Murty, Unknown Plancarte, Unknown Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
Shalek E Modee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swint v. International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00491
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint
Defendant:
Bush Boake Allen, Inc. and International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
