Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Delmo Torrefranca v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 10-17312
Plaintiff - Appellant: DELMO FIGURA TORREFRANCA
Defendant - Appellee: DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director of Arizona Department of Correction (ADC) at ADC, TERRY L. GODDARD, Attorney General at Attorney General Office, RANDALL M. HOWE, Chief Counsel at Criminal Appeals Section and others
Delmo Torrefranca v. Terry Goddard, et al
as 10-16192
Plaintiff - Appellant: DELMO FIGURA TORREFRANCA
Defendant - Appellee: TERRY GODDARD, Attorney General at Attorney General Office, RANDALL M. HOWE, Chief Counsel at Criminal Appeals Section, RICHARD M. ROMLEY, Maricopa County Attorney at Maricopa County Attorney's Office and others
Torrefranca v. Schriro et al
as 2:2009cv01526
Plaintiff: Delmo Figura Torrefranca
Defendant: Dora B. Schriro, Terry Goddard, Randall M Howe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torrefranca v. Goddard et al
as 2:2009cv01517
Plaintiff: Delmo Figura Torrefranca
Defendant: Terry L. Goddard, Randall M Howe, Richard M Romley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Coffman v. David Runnels, et al
as 09-16255
Petitioner - Appellant: WILLIAM JAMES COFFMAN
Respondent - Appellee: DAVID RUNNELS, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and SISTO, Warden
Daniel Ray Coffman v. Kathy Prosper et al
as 2:2009cv01248
Petitioner: Daniel Ray Coffman
Respondent: Kathy Prosper and Anthony Del Real
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Schriro et al
as 2:2008cv01446
Plaintiff: Michael Dean Davis
Defendant: Dora Schriro and Coffman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coffman v. Clark County Detention Center
as 2:2007cv01548
Plaintiff: Preston Coffman
Defendant: Clark County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?