Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Alvin Ross v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 09-17855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALVIN RONNEL ROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Gov., in his individual & official capacity, JAMES E. TILTON, CDCR Sect., in individual & official capacity and JAMES DAVIS, BPH Chair, in individual & official capacity
Staffiero v. Clark et al
as 2:2009cv01717
Petitioner:
Paul Staffiero
Respondent:
Ken Clark and James Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Staffiero v. Clark et al
as 1:2009cv01188
Petitioner:
Paul Staffiero
Respondent:
Ken Clark and James Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lawrence Remsen v. Attorney General of the State, et al
as 09-15756
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAWRENCE REMSEN
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, JAMES E. TILTON, JAMES DAVIS and others
Russell v. Procunier, et al
as 2:2009cv00707
Plaintiff:
Ronald Russell
Defendant:
R K Procunier, Howard Way, Raymond C. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anthony Genniro v. J. Salazar, et al
as 08-56973
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY GENNIRO
Respondent - Appellee:
J. F. SALAZAR
Respondent:
JAMES DAVIS, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and JAMES E. TILTON
Woods v. Palmer et al
as 2:2008cv02453
Plaintiff:
Robert S Woods
Defendant:
Geneva Palmer, James Davis, P VanCor and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gary Masse v. James Davis, et al
as 08-16961
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY J. MASSE
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES DAVIS, JAMES E. TILTON, M. MARTEL and others
James Bennett v. Peter Shaw, et al
as 08-16872
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DAVIS BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER L. SHAW and PHILLIP A. TREVINO
Nantes v. Davis et al
as 2:2008cv01684
Plaintiff:
Florentino Nantes
Defendant:
James Davis and California Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
